GA Tracking Code

Tuesday 9 June 2015

Resisting the Tyranny of the Learning Backlog


Whilst working through The Selenium Guidebook I caught myself doing something that I know I'm sometimes guilty of.
Trying to power through learning to get it "done" and move on to the next thing on my list.

If a course/book outlines a concept or works through an example and then encourages the student to play around with that in their own time, too often I don't do it. I'd rather continue "making progress".

Why? Because as the title I chose for this blog suggests, I allow myself to feel under the pressure of "too much to learn".

That learning backlog in Trello, and the list of tweeted links that I favourite for further investigation, get longer every day. And learning is slow when I mostly have to fit it into late evenings or weekends.

Learning shouldn't be a numbers game
Because of some sort of underlying insecurity, perhaps reinforced by most job ads, I feel that there is too much I don't know to call myself a good Tester. I worry that the majority of Testers are more skilled, and better informed, than I am.

I tend also to beat myself up if it takes me a long time to "get" a topic or exercise in my learning. A "long time" being longer than I imagine other people would need.

But where's my evidence for either of those thoughts? I need to apply the critical thinking skills that I claim to value!

I'm in danger of playing a numbers game with learning. Of thinking it's about quantity not quality.

And yet I know that I'm more likely to absorb material if I spend additional time working and practicing on it myself beyond the given examples. Sometimes I do that, but too often I neglect it to move on to another subject area that I feel I need to know about.
It's not such a surprise then that I can find learning doesn't "stick".

Specialise or generalise - that old question
I've often mulled in the past whether I should narrow down an area of testing to specialise in. (And risk narrowing my opportunities in the process.)

Generally, I do focus on broadly "web"-related learning because that's where I got into testing and where my interests mostly lie. But that's still a big area - and it's not even what I currently do for a day job.

Whilst technical skills are where I feel most lacking, I wouldn't want to neglect studying what I believe to be the core responsibilities of the tester (even if you wouldn't get that impression from most job ads) - thinking skills.

So it can pretty quickly seem like there is "too much to learn" and that I need to touch all of it to be taken seriously.

Intellectually I know that I can't be good at every tool or technology and at all kinds of testing. But emotionally I worry that I always need to be good at more stuff than I am.

Having an overview of multiple topics is no doubt good - but is it better than being well-informed on a few? (Especially when you consider that knowledge of tools/technologies needs to be constantly kept on top of and 'upgraded'?)

The "generalist" T-shaped Tester
I would regard myself as sharing Rob Lambert's view of the value of  the T-shaped Tester. And, having got in to testing quite late in my working life, I have other skills 

But if Rob sees "testing" as representing the vertical bar of the T, where I get hung up on is how far to generalise or to specialise within that "testing" bar.

Am I trying to be a kind of "Unicode character 0166-shaped" Tester?  (Not that that shape quite captures it either!)  With a broad range of technical knowledge?
Unicode character 0166

At the moment it feels like I have unrealistic expectations of my ability to learn.

Perhaps I need the confidence that not knowing something is ok providing you have the capacity and will to learn it when you need it. And that you always bring a set of core skills whatever the context.

Never stop learning
Learning is a continuous process and learning is a motivator for me. I wouldn't want to be in a situation where there was nothing new to learn.

But it shouldn't be stressful. Working through a learning backlog should be a source of pleasure and not a cloud hanging over me.

I need to make that mental shift, and maybe that requires narrowing my ambitions.

4 comments:

  1. I know your pain. It's a nightmare looking at the sheer number of books and articles and topics to learn. I've not yet found a way to reduce the burden other than to try and live in the moment :) And that's a skill in itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rob, thanks for commenting.
      Yep, as something of a worrier/pessimist I'm not great at living in the moment!

      I need to try and appreciate the knowledge I have more - maybe try comparing it with the "me" of 12mths earlier? - rather than obsessing on the knowledge I don't have.
      And maybe make a point of reading down the "done" column in Trello occasionally to appreciate what I've achieved rather than just getting anxious about the "backlog" one.

      But I still feel like I need to narrow my area of interests because trying to put everything on my list is looking like the way to madness.

      I'm already trying to be a bit more selective. Like resisting those heavily discounted offers on Udemy courses in new areas. ;-)

      Delete
  2. I think it's incredible easy to get caught up in this. Incredibly easy. And the more you are keen to learn, ironically, the easier it is.

    I usually describe it as a BFS vs DFS problem because it's nothing more than our own pursuit of knowledge in a gigantic search space. Should we go about it breadth-first or depth-first? There is obviously no right answer 100% of the time and that in itself should concede us some peace of mind. I would say that a mix of both is possible, ie. for a period of time, really go deep into something, then get into BFS mode again for a while. Common sense to the rescue.

    Beyond that, I think the most important thing is getting the basics right, whatever your specific area may be. If you get most of the basic abstract concepts, learning specific technologies or subjects that necessarily build on top of that will become easier and less stressful. If the foundation is not there, you'll have an even harder time competing against that ever-increasing backlog.

    But yeah, thanks for putting into words something that I'm sure the majority of us have felt all along. Only I know how embarassingly long my Pocket queue is and I won't tell anyone! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great comment - thanks. I really like the breadth vs depth concept as a way to frame this.
      And, yes, "getting the basics right" - whilst it seems like an obvious approach - is something I'm not sure I've been doing well enough.

      I'm now trying to prioritise my backlog so that I reinforce knowledge in one or two areas for a while, rather than trying to gain a passing acquaintance with everything that's out there in the hope that will make me more capable or employable!

      Depth, then back to breadth later - just as you say.

      Of course, having said that I did just sign up for a new edX course today...

      Delete